Nousland

Does it matter if it isn't? Is the best answer to take a pragmatic approach and simply refute skepticism through its lack of practical use while admitting that there are limitations to human reason? While I'm at it- any book recommendations on the subject? How about a good introduction to metaphysics? You might be able to tell I'm new to this whole field! When I say skepticism I am referring to radical skepticism, the idea that knowledge is impossible, not to the useful type of skepticism.

I'm just wondering what evidential support there is for Kant's epistemology presented in the Critique of Pure Reason.

I need the names of a few Philosophers who have good works about Epistemology from the Late Modern Era (The time when names like Soren Kierkegaard were still around). Also, if you know any other names from other Eras, let me know as well, but I need a Philosopher from the Late Modern Era specifically for a paper I have due on Epistemology.

The kind (of epistemology) founded only on after-the-fact physical knowledge, obtained, of course, from sensory observations &/or experiments?

Plato maintained as a cornerstone of his ethics, politics, and epistemology that there are two worlds. How is this distinction related to his ethics, politics and epistemology?